The statement ” The masses are always right” has been tried
and tested and found to be not necessarily true. What constitutes a norm or a
rule is not the amount of people who say so, but what the rule says. People can
be led, and there are elements in being led by the masses that both excuse the
individual for his or her acts, and have a blind eye to what is right.
Social media judges; well, so it seems, but it is more
correct to say that people use social media to be aroused into rash judgment,
and this is shared as a massive attack. In this way the individual becomes part
of the masses, and in the same way the individual becomes part of the mob. The
mob can lynch, and this force in the tapestry of social controls may cause real
action. This is a force that may strip someone of his or her job, ostracize
from society, mete out a punishment, which is not based on any written law, but
simply on the sentiment of the mob.
It surprises me that we hold to this standard in a
democracy.
Are we truly to be ruled by the mob? Do we set aside law and
order when the forces in the mob are too powerful? Do we simply give in and
agree?
What is a democracy, then? It is a majority rule, but not
arbitrary rule. One of the foundations of this democracy is the agreement upon
common laws and regulations. The formal social control cannot be set aside in
favour of the angry mob.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar