The book “ How To Do Things With Words” by J. L . Austin,
was published in 1962, and has been a good challenge to many to further
describe and map the field of pragmatics, of language usage. One of his
students, John Searle, developed the initial ideas and introduced the concept
‘Speech Acts’. We do things with words, and we cause things to happen simply by
uttering meaningful noises by our mouth. There has to be the right
circumstances, and I have to have certain authority, etc., but given these, we
perform through speech. One example could be command: Come. Another could be
the change of social status when a licensed priest utters the words: “I now
pronounce you man and wife.” It causes real change.
There is
something yet undiscovered, something to yet be the subject of study: In the
intersecting fields of language, God, and physics, there is an ultimate speech
act: And God said: be… light, water, soil, air, planets, vegetation, animals
and people – life … And it was so. There are examples of the ultimate speech
acts. Something new emerges out of this bidding. Naturally, as God, he can
provide the information needed for ultimate change.
There is
something about the words, the acts, which stirs me. There is no magic formula
in the language, but there is a creative element in it.
God
created. I have no qualms about stating that as a fact, although some may
squeak out a ‘how do you know’ skepticism. Anyone who denies the statement will
have the same problem defending his or her statement, as I may have with mine.
But the consequences are far more beneficial for my stand.
I was not
going to battle buzzing flies in the air.
I read an article a friend had posted on Facebook, about a
young and bright physicist at MIT called Jeremy England[1].
There were two things which fascinated me: One is that he suggests that life is
a consequence of physical laws and not due to randomness. The other is that
there is much more to the language in the Biblical texts than we are accustomed
to think.
The writer of the article, Megan
Walsh, is surprised and curious about the young academic star’s insistence on
God’s reality. But she leaves me wonder and wanting to learn more – about the
connections Jeremy England finds in the words for create, creating, creation,
come into being, be, being etc. Science may describe, may give indications on
how things connect and coexist, he concurs, but it can never give any answer
about what we should do with it. An ethical aspect emerges. Normative aspects
want answers, too.
Creation is more than taxonomy,
more than naming and categorizing. Still, the naming is important for knowing. Perhaps
it carries in its origin a creative activity?
As my a priori point of departure I
say: God is. God is creative. God is ultimate intelligence. And He speaks it
into being… well, that did not sound too new. That was old news. But maybe that
is what we have: the Creative, intelligent God who is always there. Our
relation with God is also morally reflexive. We stand responsible before Him.
“And God said:…. And it was” “And God says…And it is”.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar