The daily dose of delight, of
discernment, of deliberating beauty beyond belief - that is something
which brings me joy, brightens my inner world. I bathe in beauty at
times. I soak it up like sun in the springtime.
Perhaps this is all it is, a gift of
light. Perhaps there is no further purpose, for in itself it is
fulfilment. And yet - I read Gadamer's1
treatment of Kant's work2
on the aesthetical judgment, and what it might contribute with. To
what extent does the aesthetical sense contribute to evaluation of
values? What is the connection between the ethical and the
aesthetical? How does the connection between the good, the true and
the beautiful play out in our sense of knowing?
The experience I may have of something
which brings me joy and deep, innocent pleasure, due to its innate
qualities which I call beauty, to what extent is this experience of
value in regards to epistemology? I realize it does not give my any
insight into the thing itself, to its make-up, its being. Fair
enough. I am not particularly interested in that, anyway. That would
be to divide it up into recognizable particles and explain the
phenomenon on material terms. That would be useless. It is much more
powerful to connect heart and mind and behold the beautiful. I
collect it in my mind, and I may pull out memories and behold them
again, enjoy them again, with renewed reception.
I see people's eyes. That can be
tricky. It may look like I stare a bit, or look intently, as I notice
the various facets of the eye's colours, how it reflects the light of
the day or night, how the inner lines are smooth and clean. I see the
shape, like almonds, or more rectangular, and it matches the inner
beauty of the soul. Eyes are engaging.
I see nature. I see built structures.
I see artwork. The objects are many, but, again, it is not the
objects which possess importance. It is more the process of quickly
discerning beauty from the lack of beauty, the related process which
defines the good and the true in light of the beautiful.
Enchanted village |
Do I make any sense? What I am driving
at is to suggest that we do possess an ability, a faculty, by which
we exercise aesthetical judgement. I have an aesthetical eye. We all
do, but we can learn to use it in discernment. It may be a gift, like
a gift of light. It may be stronger in some. But I believe we all
possess it. We all know we enjoy something beautiful, and it
satisfies us, gives us even a sense of self worth at times.
Some may argue that we have different
tastes, different opinions on what we call beautiful. I see variants,
but no real differences. If we let the beautiful be defined mutually
by the good and the true, I think we all agree on the general concept
of beauty. A personal taste actually only confirms my claim that we
all have the faculty of aesthetical judgement intact. We use it more
than we realize, and I believe we act upon it also much more that we
realize. And here I am back again at the connection between ethics
and aesthetics. To do good is beautiful. It comforts the heart. It
brightens my inner world.
Kviteseid, my village |
1Truth
and Method, part 1 , (Wahrheit und Methode )
2Critique
of Judgement ( Kritk der Urteilskraft)
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar